Support the Site
Kember
Moderator: andysfootball
Kember
Isnt it funny that now that Kember has been released by the coalition forces how brave our wonderful armed forces are
Makes a change for all the slagging theve had by certain elements of the press and the appeasers.
Makes a change for all the slagging theve had by certain elements of the press and the appeasers.
They went over there to see if they could do their bit for the Iraqi people.
Then they got captured by some nutters who either...
{a} saw evil Western infidel pig-dogs who shouldn't be in their country, the very same ones who want Sunnis and Shias at each other's throats.
{b} saw the chance to get a lot of money out of Western governments,
Hopefully they'll realise that it's no longer worth their while (and I'll let you guess who I mean by 'they')
Then they got captured by some nutters who either...
{a} saw evil Western infidel pig-dogs who shouldn't be in their country, the very same ones who want Sunnis and Shias at each other's throats.
{b} saw the chance to get a lot of money out of Western governments,
Hopefully they'll realise that it's no longer worth their while (and I'll let you guess who I mean by 'they')
-
- Full Time Gobber
- Posts: 4834
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:25 pm
- Location: Marsden South Shields
I have heard that Norman Kember did not want any military intervention to rescue him. It was also posted on another board that he didn't thank his rescuers. Don't know how true that is but it seems very bad form if he didn't.
He and other 'peace activists' should have stayed away and this is the opinion of somebody who opposed the military intervention.
He and other 'peace activists' should have stayed away and this is the opinion of somebody who opposed the military intervention.
And let another British citizen get killed?sless wrote:they should have let him rot in hell
its a war not a picnic
send him the bill
THe Americans blowing up a military hospital to save a Prisoner of War when they were chasing Saddam out of Iraq was excessive and unnecessary. A gang of numbskulls capturing aid workers is different andf I hope his rescuers shot his captors to hell.
Kember may have been a peace activist back home, but he was there what he could do for normal Iraqi people (who aren't the enemy) he was misguided, but he doesn't deserve to be beheaded for that.
Also, if he was one of those forming a human shield around Iraqi armouments during the war, then we need him back over here to face charges of treason, Milosevic keeling over in The Hague pleased no-one, least of all the Serbs.
He stood up for his beliefs, although he took said stand way too far by bleating about violence being used to save him, he was in the custody of violent people and others in his situation, who were in Iraq for the same purpose, have ended up dead.
My feelings, he should be grateful to have got out of that situation alive, regardless of whether or not he approved of the method used to get him out that situation and yes, it was right for the Army to have been sent in to save him.
As for whether or not he should have been in there in the first place... well it was unwise for him to be in Iraq (as it was unwise for Ken Bigley and Margaret Hassan to be in Iraq) he knew the risks he was taking and he can't complain about that, I wouldn't have gone over there, no chance.
My feelings, he should be grateful to have got out of that situation alive, regardless of whether or not he approved of the method used to get him out that situation and yes, it was right for the Army to have been sent in to save him.
As for whether or not he should have been in there in the first place... well it was unwise for him to be in Iraq (as it was unwise for Ken Bigley and Margaret Hassan to be in Iraq) he knew the risks he was taking and he can't complain about that, I wouldn't have gone over there, no chance.
-
- Full Time Gobber
- Posts: 4834
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:25 pm
- Location: Marsden South Shields
Personnally I am on no one's side about these people that know the dangers' going into a foreign country. There are do gooders and do gooders, some go in for their own glory, some go in to really try and help others. The question I would like to ask is' How far does our government go to help these captives? Who decides to go in or not. I would like to give a small instance, a couple of weeks ago a couple of blokes, and I mean blokes well in there 30s climed over the fence at Roker pier to go fishing. to cut the story short, they got stranded and could'nt get back past the waves lashing against the pier. The coastgaurd was phoned and after a short rescue they were brought safely back to land. My point is' these men scaled a fence that was keeping them safe from any danger
so who decides that others should risk their lives to rescue these men.>>>>
so who decides that others should risk their lives to rescue these men.>>>>
Thats exactly right; the weather was so rough they decided on the tunnel
instead of the boat, or the copter. Anyway thats a small story, what I was saying, is there is someone who decides what is to be done and how it is done and where it is to be done. Can these people pick and choose who to rescue and who not to. I don't know.>>>>>>
instead of the boat, or the copter. Anyway thats a small story, what I was saying, is there is someone who decides what is to be done and how it is done and where it is to be done. Can these people pick and choose who to rescue and who not to. I don't know.>>>>>>