Huntley to sue?

average len · Post by **average len** » Sat Mar 06, 2004 2:56 pm

My mate down in London tells me he's seen a report in a local paper that Ian Huntley may be suing Belmarsh prison for compensation over the recent attack on him by another prisoner. Huntley reckons the warders failed in their duty to protect him, and he should have compensation. He'll be applying for legal aid, it seems.

It's not definite at the moment, but if he does get leave to appeal, plus a nice bundle of public money for legal costs, I reckon the rest of us might as well give up. We'll have reached the end of the road.

average len · Post by **average len** » Sat Mar 06, 2004 3:17 pm

Dear ^Rennaps. How can you be so sure he wont get compensation? Wasn't there that case of the convicted p********e who stubbed his toe in the shower, and got £20K for his trouble?

I won't be surprised if our friend Ian H gets it, too.

gazza · Post by **gazza** » Sat Mar 06, 2004 11:02 pm

hey............aptlee put............hoo`z goin tuh foot thu bill..................
us thatz hoo............................plus a grand a week tuh keep
thu sik f##k away from wah kidz...........eh....
WUH ALL LIVE IN TONEE FLAIR`Z PRISON...........what other good
ideaz will seep across thu atlantic from our great amerian couzinz.....
i wonda...........................

average len · Post by **average len** » Tue Mar 09, 2004 3:45 pm

Even if he doesn't get the old compo, if he's allowed to try some grasping lawyer will get paid anyway. The lawyer wont care about the result so long as he gets paid through legal aid. How much will that cost us?

average len · Post by **average len** » Tue Mar 09, 2004 6:33 pm

Cherry, I take your point. But cunning lawyers can always find "grounds" for action, and all they have to do is spin the case out for as long as they can, and the cash rolls in. They dont have to give a fart about the result, they get paid anyway.

So what about: no win, no fee?

memor · Post by **memor** » Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:25 pm

When I see title of post I really curious.
HUNTLEY TO SUE
I thought Huntley was going to have s*x change operation and going to call himself Sue.

I so glad you explained everything. Although for what he did to those little girls. Maybe he should have his Gonads sawn off with rust tin can. Without aneasthetic .
Memor

memor · Post by **memor** » Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:23 am

I write lots of sensible things. I think maybe they to suttle for you.
Memor

funny as fcuk · Post by **funny as fcuk** » Fri Mar 12, 2004 6:38 pm

He's a sick barsteward, and her as well.

They both should be shot

I don't like violence but this is all they understand.

average len · Post by **average len** » Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:00 pm

My London mate now tells me he's read that the Warders Organisation has said that Huntley does not intend to sue.

Let's hope so.

average len · Post by **average len** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 6:56 pm

Nothing more heard about any plan of Huntly to sue, but did you read how some people want make prison warders call all murderers "Mister"?

Isn't that barmy? Yes, Mister Huntley. No, Mister Whiting. Three bags full, Mister Jack The Ripper.

Dont these w*nkers have anything better to do than come up with stupid ideas like this?

average len · Post by **average len** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:00 pm

Very good, Rennaps, a most amusing witticism! (Sounds of someone dying of mirth.)

But seriously, it's a pretty horrible proposal, isn't it?

average len · Post by **average len** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:23 pm

Cherry:
1. Can you imagine the effect on warders' morale having to crawl to a monster like Huntley in this way?
2. How are you supposed to keep these scum in order and maintain discipline if you're not even allowed to speak to them sharply and with real authority?
3. Vermin like Bady, Huntley, etc., do not DESERVE to be called Mister. That's a term of polite respect we keep for normal members of our society.

Podgy Pete · Post by **Podgy Pete** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:41 pm

I can tell you this for nothing.
No Prison Officer is going to call a con sir. Doesn't matter how many times he's ordered to do so.

PP

average len · Post by **average len** » Thu Mar 25, 2004 1:15 pm

Ravaan:

Quote: "I'm sure the warders'd much rather call him Mr. Huntley than Ian."

that's the point; they don't have to call him either Ian or Mister Huntley - they just call him Huntley.

And the idiot woman that came up with this proposal has also said the warders don't relate enough to the inmates, and the inmates have to wait too long to get articles they've ordered delivered, and so on.

Perhaps we should give Huntley - oh dear, I'm so sorry, MISTER Huntley - compensation for having the nerve to lock him up in the first place.

average len · Post by **average len** » Wed Mar 31, 2004 2:56 pm

The latest loony proposal, to let criminals vote.

"Tell me, Mister Huntley, what should government policy be on convicted child murderesr?"

"Well, colour televisions, and visits to Alton Towers, and loads of pocket money, and very early release. That's what I'll be voting for, anyway."

"Thank you."

"Thank you what?"

"Sorry; thank you SIR."

Wonderful world, ennit?

average len · Post by **average len** » Thu Apr 01, 2004 10:13 am

What do you mean Daily Mail fluff.

The Mail reported that this proposal has been made. This proposal has been made, so the Mail is merely telling the truth. How is that "fluff"?

average len · Post by **average len** » Thu Apr 01, 2004 11:12 am

Cherry Phosphate: Ah right; It's somebody else's fluff, not the Mail's. OK.